sense in the Iraq saga?

I watched Blix and his colleague make their presentations. It was clear that the arms inspectors are making progress. A few things have been identified - which are of concern - the most serious being the missing 1,000 tonnes of chemicals - that can be used as weapons. Of great relief is the positive report that Iraq has definitely not got a nuclear capability.

It is clear that the French and German position on Iraq is correct - the weapons inspectors should be given a little more time to allow the Saddam regime to comply.

I personally do not want to see Americans and British troops killed - when with a little more time - Iraq can be effectively neutralised.